When it comes to sports, there are certainly a lot of really dumb things, but for me, one of the dumbest is surely the ranking system certain leagues/sports use. From the BCS in college football to FIFA’s international football rankings to, of course, the ICC’s format rankings, it all seems so convoluted, and wrong, and random. The formulas are simultaneously too simplistic and too complex. They try to explain the intangible using the tangible, and that never works. It’s like trying to use statistics to describe the act of falling in love. It just doesn’t translate. And to use these rankings to decide championships and tournament seedings lends an air of corruption to the whole system.
The ICC’s rankings are, of course, some of the most ridiculously complicated out there, and we all tend to give them a bit of a hard time – but just how wrong – or right – are they?
Take the current T20 rankings, for example. They go something like this:
Team | Matches | Points | Rating |
---|---|---|---|
Sri Lanka | 26 | 2848 | 129 |
India | 19 | 1843 | 123 |
Pakistan | 40 | 3638 | 121 |
South Africa | 31 | 2940 | 118 |
Australia | 31 | 2869 | 115 |
West Indies | 29 | 2690 | 112 |
New Zealand | 29 | 2475 | 108 |
England | 34 | 2811 | 104 |
Ireland | 17 | 1106 | 92 |
Bangladesh | 18 | 1034 | 74 |
Afghanistan | 15 | 928 | 66 |
Netherlands | 12 | 508 | 56 |
Scotland | 13 | 545 | 50 |
Zimbabwe | 17 | 589 | 45 |
Kenya | 17 | 633 | 42 |
Canada | 8 | 11 | 2 |
Is Sri Lanka really the best T20I team out there? I think so. Probably. But what about all the other places? Should Afghanistan really be behind Bangladesh? And India has only played 19 qualifying matches – shouldn’t that go against them? And is England REALLY that bad?
Thankfully, we have a T20 World Championship going on right now. So let’s test these out – see how silly – or how spot on – they truly are.
The qualifying matches are happening as I type, but if we use rankings alone, Ireland and Bangladesh will move on to the Super 10 stage.
Then Group 1 will look like this:
South Africa |
Sri Lanka |
England |
New Zealand |
Ireland |
And Group 2 like this:
Pakistan |
India |
Australia |
West Indies |
Bangladesh |
And based solely on ICC’s rankings – and just assuming for fun that there are no ties or no results – the Group 1 Super 10 stage will play out like this:
Super 10; Group 1 | Winner |
SA v SL | SL |
ENG v NZ | NZ |
NZ v SA | SA |
SL v IRE | SL |
SA v IRE | SA |
ENG v SL | SL |
NZ v IRE | NZ |
ENG v SA | SA |
ENG v IRE | ENG |
NZ v SL | SL |
And the Group 2 Super 10 stage like this:
Super 10; Group 2 | Winner |
IND v PAK | IND |
AUS v PAK | PAK |
IND v WI | IND |
WI v BANG | WI |
AUS v WI | AUS |
IND v BANG | IND |
PAK v BANG | PAK |
AUS v IND | IND |
AUS v BANG | AUS |
PAK v WI | PAK |
Final Super 10 tables:
Group 1 | Wins | Points |
South Africa – 2 | 3 | 6 |
Sri Lanka – 1 | 4 | 8 |
New Zealand | 2 | 4 |
England | 1 | 2 |
Ireland | 0 | 0 |
Group 2 | ||
Pakistan – 2 | 3 | 6 |
India – 1 | 4 | 8 |
Australia | 2 | 4 |
West Indies | 1 | 2 |
Bangladesh | 0 | 0 |
Those results put Sri Lanka v Pakistan in Semi-Final #1 (Sri Lanka to win) and India v South Africa in Semi-Final #2 (India to win).
And then Sri Lanka will win it all, just as the ICC Ranking Gods decreed.
So why even play the games?
I am kidding of course. We play the games because sport exists outside the realm of math and science and statistics. Sure, they play their role, but at the end of the day, sports are played by humans, and humans are by nature completely unpredictable.
But just as an exercise, I will track the 23 matches above as they go – noting the actual outcome versus the robot’s prediction – and see how it all shakes out.
You have your way to enjoy a T20 World Championship, and I have mine.
2 Replies to “Rankings”